getting bluer
Now that Obama has coattails, the Senate races are looking more interesting. At this time, the Dems have a 16% chance of controlling a filibuster-proof 60 seats, and that number is growing.
I'm of two minds on this. On the one hand, I desperately want Republicans to lose, and lose bad. I'd like to beat them into the ground with a stick. Neocons deserve it for what they've done to this country and the future of libertarian and non-fundamental conservatism. Demographically the country is moving democratic (younger, larger minorities, and more educated). Instead of embracing this and moving toward the center, Republicans are stubbornly insisting on remaining the party that embraces evangelical fundamentalism and white male supremacy. They were already well on their way to becoming the permanent minority party for a generation, and their cynical and identity-embrace of Palin has exacerbated this. Informed women feel insulted at being expected to vote for her with no regard for Palin's actual capabilities, just because she's a woman!
On the other hand, absolute power corrupts absolutely. As annoying as filibuster showdowns can be, they are a very useful check on majority rule, which can be a problem in any democracy but especially those that do not use a parliamentary system.
I suppose my ideal scenario would be for Democrats to barely reach 60 this election cycle and lose it in 2010, but I'm guessing the odds of that are pretty long.
It's more likely they'll fall just shy of 60 this time around and have a good chance of attaining it in 2010, assuming an Obama presidency goes well.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(562)
-
▼
September
(159)
- Fair and Balanced watch III
- So it really is true
- Handbasket express
- More Hewitt fun
- All the magazines and all the king's newspapers
- Quote of the day II
- Feisty as ever
- Sing for Supreme Leader Obama
- Quotes of the day
- Banks matter
- No distractions
- Losing everything
- This is your legacy
- Deep thought of the day
- Self-parody watch
- Pleasant surprise
- If this isn't satire, it should be
- Why not nationalize?
- Gambler in chief II
- Interviewing Palin
- Quotes of the day
- Bailout flailing...
- The bailout in plain english
- Woah Virginia
- Eagleton scenario examined
- The real new best hope for conservatism
- At the risk of beating a dead horse
- Voting for change
- The next debate II
- Fair and Balanced watch II
- Fair and Balanced watch
- Ah, Carolina
- Gringo surcharge: $30
- Why McCain makes no sense
- Your moment of xkcd
- Why can't I have a dinosaur?
- Artificial rainbow
- Strategy v. tactics
- Blue and
- Live from New York
- Mid-sunday roundup
- Schleppin' to Florida
- Fantastic wedding
- Exhuberant and scripted
- What went on with that deal?
- Question from the bubble
- Disappointing news
- The whole debate
- I see a bluebath
- What's this "tell-leaf-own" you speak of?
- Kids these days
- Kos' Research 2000 trend
- Quote of the day
- More debate axing
- The highlights
- Great race humor
- The next debate
- New Republican strategy
- From the Department of Absolutism
- To infinity
- My friends
- Advantages of having an experienced running mate
- Monkeys!
- Debate reax
- On Palin getting worse
- Fore!
- I call media bias!
- The Eagleton scenario
- Curb your enthusiasm
- The beat goes on, and on...
- Deep thought for the day
- Lady got fans
- Spike Lee concedes
- Polling variables
- Christianism watch
- Quote of the day
- Gambler in chief
- Sarah the unready
- Sarah's former support
- Holy endorsement
- Hedging on Carolina
- Big news: Palin takes press questions
- More on Alaskan wolves
- In memoriam
- Palin at church
- Lest we forget
- Wish I had written this
- McCain asks to postpone
- Baby Talk
- Net favorabilities
- Free Sarah Palin
- Palin investigates Palin
- Wool, meet eyes
- Palin goes to the UN
- Quote of the day
- Mommy, wait outside.
- Biden enjoying himself
- Financial journalism
- Rile the base
- Oh, Virginia
-
▼
September
(159)




No comments:
Post a Comment