skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Politico:
President Barack Obama eats his vegetables and exercises every day — and he really wants you to do the same.
[..] The president is filling top posts at Health and Human Services with officials who, in their previous jobs, outlawed trans fats, banned public smoking or required restaurants to provide a calorie count with that slice of banana cream pie.
Even Congress is getting into the act, giving serious consideration to taxing sugary drinks and alcohol to help pay for the overhaul.
[..] The whole situation has libertarians craving a basket of onion rings and a beer.
“If you care about the sorts of things I do, then you are going to be losing big-time for the next four to eight years,” said David Harsanyi, a Denver Post columnist and author of the book “Nanny State: How Food Fascists, Teetotaling Do-Gooders, Priggish Moralists and Other Boneheaded Bureaucrats Are Turning America Into a Nation of Children.”
Don’t get them wrong, critics such as Harsanyi say — they like broccoli and they lift barbells and they have no particular beef with a healthy president who was once described by his physician as having “no excess body fat.” They just don’t like it when government becomes the messenger and the enforcer.
The appointment last month of New York Public Health Commissioner Thomas Frieden as director of the CDC really made the libertarian-minded nervous.
Frieden is a big part of the reason New Yorkers no longer smoke in bars or eat trans fats at restaurants and find calorie counts on their menus. Frieden once said that when anyone in New York dies at an early age from a preventable disease, “it’s my fault.”
[..] libertarians like Michael D. Tanner, director of health and welfare studies at the Cato Institute, aren’t looking forward to it.
“At the very least,” said Tanner, “we are going to get nagged a lot.”
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(1987)
-
▼
June
(148)
- Retort of the day
- "Thanks for Sharing, Governor. Now Shut Up."
- Religious views of sex
- The worst is behind us
- And then there were sixty
- Quote for the day
- Health benefits and WWII
- Debating the public option
- Obama's speech to gay rights groups
- Ricci and judicial politics
- Neocon humor
- MSM whores
- "Terrible precedents"
- More on the latest Mankiw-Krugman spat
- "The Arbiter of Ignorance"
- "Forgive Mark Sanford"
- American and Iranian nationalism
- "Sorry sir, but this sewer is catch and release on...
- Credit where credit is due
- American Imaginer
- Krugman bashes a strawman and takes a short-term v...
- Amateur hour
- A more interesting take on Sanford
- How are those bailouts comming?
- Bloggy takedown of the day
- The pitfalls of the public option
- Leaving bad enough alone
- Some choice you're giving us, lady
- King David didn't resign after his sex scandal, so...
- Missing the logic of recognizing his own would-be-...
- Guilty pleasures
- A tragic life
- Iran's Assembly of Experts
- Against mandates
- A different perspective on Iran
- Unbreakable no longer
- The more things change...
- 40% of income on healthcare in 2100 isn't so bad, ...
- In the shadow of the mountain
- Why the obsession with Sanford?
- Dick Van Patten explains why Jesus Christ is God
- Reponding to events in Iran
- Keeping quiet
- Detainee rights
- Blame the demons
- Rawr
- Israeli settlements are illegal
- Iran election tracker
- Recount
- Line of the month
- UAW jumps the shark
- Moore Award nominee
- Redneck nerdery of the week
- The first nerd presidency of the modern era
- Roger Cohen in Iran today
- Escalating violence in Iran
- Bravo, Ron Paul
- Wow
- The importance of local legitimacy
- PETA bait
- Pictures of Israeli settlements
- The professor vs. the fighter pilot
- Lesson in democracy for neocons
- About those smoking bans
- "Administration's Reform Plan Misses the Mark"
- Stage of denial
- Prophetic quote of the day
- Worldwide protests
- A genuine rally photo
- Potemkin rallies
- Manufactured controversy watch
- "The Laffer Curve of the Left"
- Tweet of the day
- The revolution will be twittered
- The minimum wage
- That Iranian "election"
- Favored constituency watch
- Quote of the day
- Ranking the public plans
- Punblic health insurance option, ctd.
- Quote of the day
- U.S. auto industry doing well
- Quote of the day
- Tipping the scale
- Procedure over innocence
- Nanny state cometh
- Freedom and responsibility
- Paging Dr. Gore
- Obama reconsiders domestic agenda
- The next Iranian president?
- One for the (neoconish) rightists
- 29 Democrats needed
- Public health insurance, antitrust, and price cont...
- Back to work
- A stock market primer
- After gay marriage
- Joe Scarborough
- Americans care about smaller government
- How stupid do they think we are?
- Misunderstanding markets, school vouchers edition
The desire to be treated like an adult, i.e., not nagged is a fair one. However, I think the libertarian position underplays the role that government can have in shaping habits. People's preferences and habits will be determined by something, and to me it does not seem obviously better to throw in the towel in hopes of not being a nag and let things like the mass media, corporations and primordial preferences have a greater say in determining people's health habits than a government attempting to act in peoples' best interests.
ReplyDeleteWe human are malleable creatures who have a proven capacity to adapt to new habits (such as eating healthy) in such a fashion that the new habit no longer is felt to be a burden (you can learn to like anything if you eat it for 14 days). And you can't miss the trans fats if they never make it on the shelf (though you might pay an extra few cents for your microwave dinner because production costs are higher. Is that a terrible investment, though?)