We are 7 months into the Obama administration and DADT (Don't Ask, Don't Tell) is still on the books. I believe anything the president does to initiate the repeal will cause a firestorm that is much, much greater than any of us activists anticipate and could significantly wound Obama politically. This is in spite of the fact that 75% of the public thinks gays should be able to serve openly in the military. Even though they are a significant minority, right wing reactionaries are waiting to ambush the president the minute he moves to repeal DADT.
So how should we repeal DADT with a minimum of damage? If I were speaking to the president, this is what I would advise him.
Wait until October when Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Mike Mullen's two year term ends. In choosing a new Chief, make sure the general or admiral has impeccable military credentials and is firmly in favor of repealing DADT. Make sure he understands this is a top priority and it is his mission to accomplish this in the first few months of his term. Also instruct the future Chairman that he is to be open and honest about his opinion and plans for DADT during the Senate confirmation hearings.
During the Senate hearings make sure the nominee is asked several DADT questions and that he publicly states that he believes DADT is a bad policy and needs to be repealed. With the Democrats in control he should be confirmed. The hearings will put him on record about his intentions for the future of DADT. By confirming him, Congress has now approved the concept. The public is on notice and Congress is on notice that things are going to change. No one should be surprised when it happens.
Then a month or two later, the Chairman appears before Congress with numerous studies showing how DADT decreases national security, how we are losing talented men and women we cannot afford to lose during war time, and that the unit cohesion argument is a myth. He formerly requests that Congress repeal DADT for the good of the armed forces. The repeal of DADT is initiated by the military.
The request was not initiated by a president who has no military service (a major Achilles heal for many). With the military requesting the change, it would give Congress the cover it needs to repeal DADT. It would also fly better with the American people. And if the military requests the change in the law, it would be much more difficult for the right wing to condemn it.
Friday, July 31
Dept. of good ideas II
Via Andrew, Citizen Crain advises:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(1987)
-
▼
July
(180)
- Dept. of good ideas II
- Looking beyond the immediate
- Reality check
- Dept. of good ideas
- Jill and Kevin's last day
- More on The Evolution of God
- Birthers of a nation
- In praise of greed
- Understocked
- Irrational hopes dashed, wrong lessons drawn
- Deep thought
- The myth of free-market health-care
- Zero tolerance policy
- Uh-oh
- "I now pronounce you monetized."
- Baffling
- And now back to your regularly scheduled programing
- Sane Republican sighting
- Meet the new boss...
- The "goodies"
- Children of the revolution
- The most important part of health-care reform
- Wyden not?
- Tyler Cowen explains what this blog is about
- Uh-oh
- Mobocracy
- Punchline
- An (un)fortunate health-care irony
- Sigh
- More Dem infighting
- Reality check
- Thanks for all the fish
- Why Megan opposes national healthcare
- House bill TKOed?
- Punchline
- 47 million, ctd.
- 25 years too late
- Irony of the day
- Where compromise is happening
- Wallabies
- KY-Sen update: Bunning drops out
- Nietzsche, updated for Palin
- Quote of the day
- Authority and conflict
- Beauty evolves
- And you thought food was expensive
- "Blue Dog Bozos"
- Love and learning
- Clutch finish
- Question of trust
- Haven't we been through this before?
- OMB vs. CBO
- Wedding entrance
- An unequal relationship
- Sigh-inducing quote of the day
- Minimum wage debate
- Tall people are happy
- Beware of Greeks bearing gifts
- Rebalancing the economy
- Supply and demand is not—repeat NOT—optional
- "Things will be worse if we add to the costs witho...
- "Abstinence-Supporting GOP State Lawmaker Admits T...
- Obama regrets the stupid comment
- 47 million
- Summer viewing
- Deep thought
- How Obama stumbled on healthcare
- Doctor apologizes for insensitivity
- Above and beyond
- Free fallin'
- "100 Things Your Kid May Never Know About"
- Obama and racial hypersensitivity
- Paying for play
- That boy needs therapy.
- What, me arrogant?
- "Married 54 Years, They Chose to Die Together"
- A longer view on the deficit and entitlements
- Photo of the day
- a little lower, please
- Dancing on the grave of the F-22
- Beating up on the Fed
- Challenge to the left: state your limits
- Yglesias vs. Yglesias
- Change!
- Same-name couple to wed
- Faux persecution
- Obama's health-care call with liberal bloggers
- "The Case Against the Case Against Taxing Health C...
- Prison reform
- "Vatican Unequivocally Confirms Automatic Excommun...
- Bad news is good news
- "A Negative Word"
- Derb's agenda
- Never gonna give that grungy teen spirit up
- Reading The Evolution of God
- Antony and the Johnsons cover Beyoncé
- Colorado traffic control
- Stimulus, then and now
- Cronkite and the Dolchstoß right
- New hi-res photos of lunar landing sites
-
▼
July
(180)



No comments:
Post a Comment