Wednesday, May 6
Union reform
I welcome doing what we can to solve these problems, however:
a) Letting union organizers bully employee support via card check is not the correct solution to the supervisor bullying problem described in the video; it's fighting fire with fire.
b) Right-to-work laws are necessary to protect the employment of those who do not wish to participate in unions.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(1987)
-
▼
May
(162)
- How far we've come
- Relative sadness
- Painting a picture
- Link o' the day
- They're still
- Focus on the Family praises Obama adoption outreach
- Total eclipse of the heart, literal version
- Judicial empathy explained
- Hating politics
- Deep thought
- 2nd order straw men
- Voice of experience
- For Memorial Day
- On vacation
- Why Obama didn't release the abuse photos
- Tent size
- Faux small governance vs. borrow-and-spend
- Pelosi-gate
- Fisking Michael Steele
- Play him off, keyboard cat...
- The GOP needs libertarians more than libertarians ...
- What are Israelis thinking?
- Facts of the day II
- Too big to fail
- Factoid of the day: $670 billion so far
- Link blag
- Speech highlights
- Animated Bach
- Contrasting hatred
- Notre Dame commencement
- Link blag
- SNL Cheney open
- Far-right nonsense
- Bring on the political messiah snickers
- Link blag
- ObamaCard
- Help has arrived
- Wingnuts of the week
- Macroeconomic words to live by
- What a difference 30 years does not make
- Untethered.he.is
- Friday video blag
- Horridness of the cap-and-trade racket
- They're EVERYWHERE!!
- Heir to the revolution?
- Addressing misconceptions of evolution
- Quote of the day IV
- Republican incongruity
- Eight signs Dick is running for president
- Quote of the day III
- Vintage media bashing
- The Iraq-torture connection
- Bush first rejected the awakening
- Thinking outside the bun
- Rasmussen numbers are bogus
- Link blag
- Take the Dick Cheney quiz
- Daily Show vs. ASU
- Quote of the day II
- The long game
- Good news! The war on drugs is over!
- Quote of the day
- The allure of high speed rail
- Free speech interlude, ctd.
- Curiouser and curiouser
- Burmese shenanigans
- Quote of the day
- Too big to fail
- Beinart and Goldberg are back
- Succinct distillation of GOP absurdity
- Meeting Republicans at their level
- Logical fallacy of the day
- Of have and have-nots
- Link blag
- Want to be the party of ideas?
- The fearmongering will continue, ctd.
- Evaluating the stimulus
- Decline of the conservative intellectual
- Quote of the day
- Link blag
- When dogs meow...
- Douthat's latest
- Non-intervention
- What's killing the newspaper business? Advertisin...
- Econ comedy
- The defense black hole
- Link blag
- Quote of the day II
- Quote of the day
- Another Geithner cold open
- Half Vulcan
- Dept. of inefficient government monopolies
- Deep thought
- No one is above suspicion
- Nerdprom (aka White House Correspondents' Dinner)
- Necessity
- Link blag
- Open letter to the Republican party
- Dambisa Moyo interviewed in Australia
- Monopoly, recession edition
- Friday video blag
- "Horray! The Second Derivative of the Unemployment...
- Free speech interlude
- The fearmongering will continue until morale impro...
- Link blag
- Eyes on Holder
- Smearing Goldwater on Civil Rights
- Dept. of absurd torture supporters
- When a blindfold isn't enough
- Mutually-exclusive takes on conservative failure
- GOP attitudes and incompetence
- Obama seeks to extend voucher program for existing...
- Giving Liberalism a fair shake
- Link blag
- The least we can do
- Decreepifying libertarianism
- Ron Paul discusses GOP on Maddow's show
- Union reform
- Prop. Maine begins
- Leaving port
- Favored constituency service
- The left's enervation of freedom
- Link blag
- Malpractice, crime, partisanship, and honor
- Evolution in 5.5 minutes
- The GOP's new favorite Democrat [updated below]
- Would you eat 16 cubes of sugar?
- Link blag
-
▼
May
(162)



Hey Gherald, I wonder if you read this: http://www.prospect.org/csnc/blogs/ezraklein_archive?month=05&year=2009&base_name=those_scary_union_organizers
ReplyDeleteEvidently card check didn't produce any intimidation in Illinois, though it's among public sector unions. Don't know if that affects things at all. I'm ambivalent about card check, though I haven't really read about too many instances of intimidation (and the getting rid of the secret ballot stuff is nonsense, of course, as EFCA just adds another option).
As for right to work, I've worked union jobs here in California (not at all a right to work state) and I've always had the option to join or not. Now I'm management and I can't join any, but I thought that closed shops had been prohibited since 1947, when Congress overrode Truman's veto of Taft-Hartley.
In the 28 states without right to work laws, paying union dues can be a condition of employment. Unions can force employers to include paying union dues in new employee hiring contracts. I don't find this acceptable.
ReplyDeleteAbout that Illinois study, just because something hasn't been abused yet doesn't mean the potential isn't there.
I would agree card check is probably not as harmful as the those on the right make it out to be, but it's also not as innocent as the left pretends. Ezra has acknowledged that card check may not be the best reform.
Personally, I prefer "quickie elections" or something similar, which are secret ballot elections that are held soon after unions start to organize, without long waits filled with anti-union propaganda. If this were combined with right-to-work, it would be swell.
Unfortunately union bosses are vehemently against right-to-work, because it takes away their ability to raise funds by force from workers who don't want to support the union.