This may be a banal insight, but I hadn't quite put the pieces together until recently.
Firstly, realize that the bulk of newspaper revenue doesn't come from subscriptions or newsstands. It comes from selling ads.
Thought experiment: Suppose all newspapers cease printing and are henceforth only available electronically. Further suppose that anyone who might wish to read a newspaper has a laptop, Kindle DX, or other good way of accessing them. Why will the ad revenue for these electronic papers never reach the ad revenue they once got in print?
Compared to their portion of the print-with-ads market (shared with magazines and the yellow pages, mostly), newspapers are only a small corner of the web-with-ads market. There are very many new, high-traffic websites that run ads.
The market for ad revenue has limits. Companies who advertise only wish to field a certain portion of revenue for it. Often, competition with the products and services of other companies will cause them to advertise more, but only to a point. Eventually, there are diminishing returns and neither they nor their competitors will increase ad spending.
Electronic newspapers now have to compete in a wider advertising market, meaning a smaller chunk of available ad revenue will be directed at them than was the case when they had a relatively large portion of the print ad market.
Additionally, major newspapers require a substantial staff for quality reporting and editing. Any website that can get traffic with lower operating costs is at a competitive advantage and can afford to offer web ad space at lower rates than newspapers would prefer.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(1987)
-
▼
May
(162)
- How far we've come
- Relative sadness
- Painting a picture
- Link o' the day
- They're still
- Focus on the Family praises Obama adoption outreach
- Total eclipse of the heart, literal version
- Judicial empathy explained
- Hating politics
- Deep thought
- 2nd order straw men
- Voice of experience
- For Memorial Day
- On vacation
- Why Obama didn't release the abuse photos
- Tent size
- Faux small governance vs. borrow-and-spend
- Pelosi-gate
- Fisking Michael Steele
- Play him off, keyboard cat...
- The GOP needs libertarians more than libertarians ...
- What are Israelis thinking?
- Facts of the day II
- Too big to fail
- Factoid of the day: $670 billion so far
- Link blag
- Speech highlights
- Animated Bach
- Contrasting hatred
- Notre Dame commencement
- Link blag
- SNL Cheney open
- Far-right nonsense
- Bring on the political messiah snickers
- Link blag
- ObamaCard
- Help has arrived
- Wingnuts of the week
- Macroeconomic words to live by
- What a difference 30 years does not make
- Untethered.he.is
- Friday video blag
- Horridness of the cap-and-trade racket
- They're EVERYWHERE!!
- Heir to the revolution?
- Addressing misconceptions of evolution
- Quote of the day IV
- Republican incongruity
- Eight signs Dick is running for president
- Quote of the day III
- Vintage media bashing
- The Iraq-torture connection
- Bush first rejected the awakening
- Thinking outside the bun
- Rasmussen numbers are bogus
- Link blag
- Take the Dick Cheney quiz
- Daily Show vs. ASU
- Quote of the day II
- The long game
- Good news! The war on drugs is over!
- Quote of the day
- The allure of high speed rail
- Free speech interlude, ctd.
- Curiouser and curiouser
- Burmese shenanigans
- Quote of the day
- Too big to fail
- Beinart and Goldberg are back
- Succinct distillation of GOP absurdity
- Meeting Republicans at their level
- Logical fallacy of the day
- Of have and have-nots
- Link blag
- Want to be the party of ideas?
- The fearmongering will continue, ctd.
- Evaluating the stimulus
- Decline of the conservative intellectual
- Quote of the day
- Link blag
- When dogs meow...
- Douthat's latest
- Non-intervention
- What's killing the newspaper business? Advertisin...
- Econ comedy
- The defense black hole
- Link blag
- Quote of the day II
- Quote of the day
- Another Geithner cold open
- Half Vulcan
- Dept. of inefficient government monopolies
- Deep thought
- No one is above suspicion
- Nerdprom (aka White House Correspondents' Dinner)
- Necessity
- Link blag
- Open letter to the Republican party
- Dambisa Moyo interviewed in Australia
- Monopoly, recession edition
-
▼
May
(162)



This is good advice but i've noticed that you have made a slight typo. When you say "never reach the ad revenue they once got in print" i think you ment------'once they got in print'
ReplyDeleteNo, the question is asking why what they get electronically will be less than what they used to get in print.
ReplyDelete