Friday, May 29

Judicial empathy explained

David Brooks takes it away.

4 comments:

  1. when brooks is on, he's ON. that was an excellent op-ed

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes. If we don't want empathy & emotion on the court, we'd have to fill it with robots, not people.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm not going to read a blog post that takes the "Judicial Confirmation Network" seriously.

    Such people--on both the right on the left--live for confirmation fights. They need to make a riot over every nominee to get funding.

    ReplyDelete
  4. BurrDeming, helpful links, but I feel like all of those arguments relate to a poor understanding of what empathy means, which this post should have dispensed with. Brooks put 3 issues that are actually worth consideration helpfully at the end of his article.

    ReplyDelete

Blog Archive