Friday, May 29

Judicial empathy explained

David Brooks takes it away.
posted 5:36 PM
Labels: ,

4 comments:

  1. MetavirusFriday, May 29, 2009 at 6:39:00 PM CDT

    when brooks is on, he's ON. that was an excellent op-ed

    ReplyDelete
  2. UNRRFriday, May 29, 2009 at 7:10:00 PM CDT

    Yes. If we don't want empathy & emotion on the court, we'd have to fill it with robots, not people.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Gherald LSaturday, May 30, 2009 at 1:30:00 AM CDT

    I'm not going to read a blog post that takes the "Judicial Confirmation Network" seriously.

    Such people--on both the right on the left--live for confirmation fights. They need to make a riot over every nominee to get funding.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Matt FlahertySunday, May 31, 2009 at 2:25:00 PM CDT

    BurrDeming, helpful links, but I feel like all of those arguments relate to a poor understanding of what empathy means, which this post should have dispensed with. Brooks put 3 issues that are actually worth consideration helpfully at the end of his article.

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Blog Archive