13 hours ago
Friday, May 29
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(1987)
-
▼
May
(162)
- How far we've come
- Relative sadness
- Painting a picture
- Link o' the day
- They're still
- Focus on the Family praises Obama adoption outreach
- Total eclipse of the heart, literal version
- Judicial empathy explained
- Hating politics
- Deep thought
- 2nd order straw men
- Voice of experience
- For Memorial Day
- On vacation
- Why Obama didn't release the abuse photos
- Tent size
- Faux small governance vs. borrow-and-spend
- Pelosi-gate
- Fisking Michael Steele
- Play him off, keyboard cat...
- The GOP needs libertarians more than libertarians ...
- What are Israelis thinking?
- Facts of the day II
- Too big to fail
- Factoid of the day: $670 billion so far
- Link blag
- Speech highlights
- Animated Bach
- Contrasting hatred
- Notre Dame commencement
- Link blag
- SNL Cheney open
- Far-right nonsense
- Bring on the political messiah snickers
- Link blag
- ObamaCard
- Help has arrived
- Wingnuts of the week
- Macroeconomic words to live by
- What a difference 30 years does not make
- Untethered.he.is
- Friday video blag
- Horridness of the cap-and-trade racket
- They're EVERYWHERE!!
- Heir to the revolution?
- Addressing misconceptions of evolution
- Quote of the day IV
- Republican incongruity
- Eight signs Dick is running for president
- Quote of the day III
- Vintage media bashing
- The Iraq-torture connection
- Bush first rejected the awakening
- Thinking outside the bun
- Rasmussen numbers are bogus
- Link blag
- Take the Dick Cheney quiz
- Daily Show vs. ASU
- Quote of the day II
- The long game
- Good news! The war on drugs is over!
- Quote of the day
- The allure of high speed rail
- Free speech interlude, ctd.
- Curiouser and curiouser
- Burmese shenanigans
- Quote of the day
- Too big to fail
- Beinart and Goldberg are back
- Succinct distillation of GOP absurdity
- Meeting Republicans at their level
- Logical fallacy of the day
- Of have and have-nots
- Link blag
- Want to be the party of ideas?
- The fearmongering will continue, ctd.
- Evaluating the stimulus
- Decline of the conservative intellectual
- Quote of the day
- Link blag
- When dogs meow...
- Douthat's latest
- Non-intervention
- What's killing the newspaper business? Advertisin...
- Econ comedy
- The defense black hole
- Link blag
- Quote of the day II
- Quote of the day
- Another Geithner cold open
- Half Vulcan
- Dept. of inefficient government monopolies
- Deep thought
- No one is above suspicion
- Nerdprom (aka White House Correspondents' Dinner)
- Necessity
- Link blag
- Open letter to the Republican party
- Dambisa Moyo interviewed in Australia
- Monopoly, recession edition
-
▼
May
(162)
when brooks is on, he's ON. that was an excellent op-ed
ReplyDeleteYes. If we don't want empathy & emotion on the court, we'd have to fill it with robots, not people.
ReplyDeleteI'm not going to read a blog post that takes the "Judicial Confirmation Network" seriously.
ReplyDeleteSuch people--on both the right on the left--live for confirmation fights. They need to make a riot over every nominee to get funding.
BurrDeming, helpful links, but I feel like all of those arguments relate to a poor understanding of what empathy means, which this post should have dispensed with. Brooks put 3 issues that are actually worth consideration helpfully at the end of his article.
ReplyDelete