John Schwenkler is against torture thought-experiments.
Reason explains the important recent court developments for gun rights. Bottom line: the Supreme Court may soon take up whether the 2nd amendment's individual right applies to state and local governments.
Megan: Governments have unique power over credit markets, and playing with them is dangerous.
Governator says we must consider legalizing pot.
MSN Money: $1,500 for a free frisbee
Thousands of words make a picture.
Wednesday, May 6
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(1987)
-
▼
May
(162)
- How far we've come
- Relative sadness
- Painting a picture
- Link o' the day
- They're still
- Focus on the Family praises Obama adoption outreach
- Total eclipse of the heart, literal version
- Judicial empathy explained
- Hating politics
- Deep thought
- 2nd order straw men
- Voice of experience
- For Memorial Day
- On vacation
- Why Obama didn't release the abuse photos
- Tent size
- Faux small governance vs. borrow-and-spend
- Pelosi-gate
- Fisking Michael Steele
- Play him off, keyboard cat...
- The GOP needs libertarians more than libertarians ...
- What are Israelis thinking?
- Facts of the day II
- Too big to fail
- Factoid of the day: $670 billion so far
- Link blag
- Speech highlights
- Animated Bach
- Contrasting hatred
- Notre Dame commencement
- Link blag
- SNL Cheney open
- Far-right nonsense
- Bring on the political messiah snickers
- Link blag
- ObamaCard
- Help has arrived
- Wingnuts of the week
- Macroeconomic words to live by
- What a difference 30 years does not make
- Untethered.he.is
- Friday video blag
- Horridness of the cap-and-trade racket
- They're EVERYWHERE!!
- Heir to the revolution?
- Addressing misconceptions of evolution
- Quote of the day IV
- Republican incongruity
- Eight signs Dick is running for president
- Quote of the day III
- Vintage media bashing
- The Iraq-torture connection
- Bush first rejected the awakening
- Thinking outside the bun
- Rasmussen numbers are bogus
- Link blag
- Take the Dick Cheney quiz
- Daily Show vs. ASU
- Quote of the day II
- The long game
- Good news! The war on drugs is over!
- Quote of the day
- The allure of high speed rail
- Free speech interlude, ctd.
- Curiouser and curiouser
- Burmese shenanigans
- Quote of the day
- Too big to fail
- Beinart and Goldberg are back
- Succinct distillation of GOP absurdity
- Meeting Republicans at their level
- Logical fallacy of the day
- Of have and have-nots
- Link blag
- Want to be the party of ideas?
- The fearmongering will continue, ctd.
- Evaluating the stimulus
- Decline of the conservative intellectual
- Quote of the day
- Link blag
- When dogs meow...
- Douthat's latest
- Non-intervention
- What's killing the newspaper business? Advertisin...
- Econ comedy
- The defense black hole
- Link blag
- Quote of the day II
- Quote of the day
- Another Geithner cold open
- Half Vulcan
- Dept. of inefficient government monopolies
- Deep thought
- No one is above suspicion
- Nerdprom (aka White House Correspondents' Dinner)
- Necessity
- Link blag
- Open letter to the Republican party
- Dambisa Moyo interviewed in Australia
- Monopoly, recession edition
-
▼
May
(162)
whether the second amendment applies to the states is actually not a hard issue. most everything in the bill of rights has already been held to apply to the states via the incorporation doctrine. see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incorporation_(Bill_of_Rights)
ReplyDeletepersonally, i don't view it as too momentous a question and the effects of such a decision wouldn't be too dramatic
But there are cases where circuit courts ruled that the 2nd doesn't apply to state & local. They've been split on this.
ReplyDeleteFTA: "Ninth Circuit Judge Ronald Gould nicely laid out the ambiguity facing the courts in his Nordyke concurrence: “The problem for our courts will be to define, in the context of particular regulation by the states and municipalities, what is reasonable and permissible and what is unreasonable and offensive to the Second Amendment.” That’s a vague mandate, and different courts will make different decisions under different circumstances. But after Heller and Nordyke, even if they lack a magic bullet to shoot down unnecessarily restrictive gun laws, courts have the proper core principles laid out. That’s far more than the gun rights community could have said even a year ago."
So now there will be more consistency in favor of rights...this seem reasonably dramatic to me.