skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Greg Mankiw
writes in the Times and
discusses:
A family of four with an income, say, of $54,000 would pay $9,900 for health care. That covers only about half the actual cost. Uncle Sam would pick up the rest.
Now suppose that the same family earns an additional $12,000 by, for example, having the primary earner work overtime or sending a secondary worker into the labor force. In that case, the federal subsidy shrinks, so the family’s cost of health care rises to $12,700.
In other words, $2,800 of the $12,000 of extra income, or 23 percent, would be effectively taxed away by the government’s new health care system.
That implicit marginal tax rate of 23 percent is a significant disincentive. And it comes on top of the explicit marginal tax rate the family already faces from income and payroll taxes. Altogether, many families would face marginal rates at or above the 50 percent level that animated the Reagan supply-side revolution.
[..] there is no simple fix. Higher marginal tax rates are an integral part of the Obama health plan.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(1987)
-
▼
November
(119)
- Climategate
- An evolutionary arms race
- Link blag
- How's that Iraq surge faring now?
- Where's Rob?
- Science groaners
- Life
- Quote of the day
- Pigovian economics
- Spreading the patriotic message everywhere
- Chart of the day
- Top five Republican distortions
- 1985 Dungeons & Dragons moral panic film
- Image search in China
- Quote of the day
- Photos of the day
- Obesity and health costs: here come the vice police
- A dirty child is a healthy child
- The "first 10 years" health spending
- The misery index
- Going Rogue in review
- The tradeoffs of health reform
- SNL does Obama in China
- The incoherent Senate debate
- Orwell vs. Huxley
- Quote of the day
- Public option politics
- Empty LA
- Conservative Democrats voting to proceed, but not ...
- The surge^H^H^H^H^Hstimulus is working!
- Gang of three to block public option?
- The end of HSAs?
- Great Wall
- The era of big government will be over
- Foreign greetings
- Protesting diplomacy
- Regional world GDPs
- Quote of the day
- Jon Stewart explains to conservative pundits why h...
- Palin's mammoth book toor
- Big Daddy Byrd
- Conan O'brien's Palin interview
- Link blag
- Blood and Treasure
- Jeffrey Flier on health reform
- Obama in China
- Sarah Palin, international face of the opposition
- That ten year-old who refused to pledge
- Former soldier faces jail for handing in discarded...
- Not quite as scary this way
- Why is the trial a problem?
- Biden's in charge
- Quote of the day
- The decade in seven minutes
- Quote of the day
- David and Goliath, 21st century edition
- How to eat a chicken wing
- Sen. Webb (D-VA) on the terror trials
- "Offensive Cyber War Turned The Insurgency In 2007"
- Morale plummets in Afghanistan, improves in Iraq
- Three cheers for limited government
- Catholics, gays, and the poor, ctd.
- What is this 'rule of law' and 'due process' you s...
- Link blag
- Quote of the day
- Local news on Rand Paul
- The other walls
- Republicans pull ahead for 2010?
- Photo of the day
- The dead zone: implicit marginal tax rates on the ...
- And now, a history of the Internet
- Link blag
- The shape of things to come
- Tear down that..wait, what?
- Afghanistan to get McChrystal light
- 100 million dead
- Blaming the president for unemployment
- Comparing Western Europe
- 20th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall
- Weapons bound for Hezbollah
- Sunday viewings
- "An open letter to Jonah Goldberg"
- Climate change diavlog
- Dept. of memories
- What is this picture?
- More on nukes
- "Under the Rightwing Rock"
- Obama on the debt
- Quote of the day
- USPS, Inc.
- No political lesson
- Jon's epic spoof of Beck
- Peace be upon the people of peace...
- Another meaningless shooting?
- Stephen Colbert vs. Stephen Colber on AGW
- GOP shoots and scores
- The purged moderate speaks
- This is why they fight
- Revisiting the achievements of the Veterans Health...
- The progressive case for an excise tax
No comments:
Post a Comment