skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Ambers
summarizes:
Now it can be fully revealed: In May of 2007, the National Security Agency launched a massive cyber offensive against insurgent cell and computer networks in Iraq, which officials believe was responsible for breaking the back of the insurgency. Shane Harris at National Journal takes you inside the Oval Office as the decision was made:
Former officials with knowledge of the computer network attack, all of whom requested anonymity when discussing intelligence techniques, said that the operation helped turn the tide of the war. Even more than the thousands of additional ground troops that Bush ordered to Iraq as part of the 2007 "surge," they credit the cyberattacks with allowing military planners to track and kill some of the most influential insurgents. The cyber-intelligence augmented information coming in from unmanned aerial drones as well as an expanding network of human spies.
When Bob Woodward wrote about unspecified techniques used to turn the tide of the war, this is what he meant.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(1987)
-
▼
November
(119)
- Climategate
- An evolutionary arms race
- Link blag
- How's that Iraq surge faring now?
- Where's Rob?
- Science groaners
- Life
- Quote of the day
- Pigovian economics
- Spreading the patriotic message everywhere
- Chart of the day
- Top five Republican distortions
- 1985 Dungeons & Dragons moral panic film
- Image search in China
- Quote of the day
- Photos of the day
- Obesity and health costs: here come the vice police
- A dirty child is a healthy child
- The "first 10 years" health spending
- The misery index
- Going Rogue in review
- The tradeoffs of health reform
- SNL does Obama in China
- The incoherent Senate debate
- Orwell vs. Huxley
- Quote of the day
- Public option politics
- Empty LA
- Conservative Democrats voting to proceed, but not ...
- The surge^H^H^H^H^Hstimulus is working!
- Gang of three to block public option?
- The end of HSAs?
- Great Wall
- The era of big government will be over
- Foreign greetings
- Protesting diplomacy
- Regional world GDPs
- Quote of the day
- Jon Stewart explains to conservative pundits why h...
- Palin's mammoth book toor
- Big Daddy Byrd
- Conan O'brien's Palin interview
- Link blag
- Blood and Treasure
- Jeffrey Flier on health reform
- Obama in China
- Sarah Palin, international face of the opposition
- That ten year-old who refused to pledge
- Former soldier faces jail for handing in discarded...
- Not quite as scary this way
- Why is the trial a problem?
- Biden's in charge
- Quote of the day
- The decade in seven minutes
- Quote of the day
- David and Goliath, 21st century edition
- How to eat a chicken wing
- Sen. Webb (D-VA) on the terror trials
- "Offensive Cyber War Turned The Insurgency In 2007"
- Morale plummets in Afghanistan, improves in Iraq
- Three cheers for limited government
- Catholics, gays, and the poor, ctd.
- What is this 'rule of law' and 'due process' you s...
- Link blag
- Quote of the day
- Local news on Rand Paul
- The other walls
- Republicans pull ahead for 2010?
- Photo of the day
- The dead zone: implicit marginal tax rates on the ...
- And now, a history of the Internet
- Link blag
- The shape of things to come
- Tear down that..wait, what?
- Afghanistan to get McChrystal light
- 100 million dead
- Blaming the president for unemployment
- Comparing Western Europe
- 20th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall
- Weapons bound for Hezbollah
- Sunday viewings
- "An open letter to Jonah Goldberg"
- Climate change diavlog
- Dept. of memories
- What is this picture?
- More on nukes
- "Under the Rightwing Rock"
- Obama on the debt
- Quote of the day
- USPS, Inc.
- No political lesson
- Jon's epic spoof of Beck
- Peace be upon the people of peace...
- Another meaningless shooting?
- Stephen Colbert vs. Stephen Colber on AGW
- GOP shoots and scores
- The purged moderate speaks
- This is why they fight
- Revisiting the achievements of the Veterans Health...
- The progressive case for an excise tax
No comments:
Post a Comment