==First half==
Palin wins on early style, I think she seemed much more appealing than in those interviews in which she couldn't anticipate the questions.
But Biden wins on substance, i.e. if you just read the debate transcripts of the first half and don't watch the video.
However, the threshold for both these "wins" really wasn't good: the other person just did even worse, some cases much worse.
So overall, a pretty unimpressive first half.
==Second half==
Biden established his footing and clearly won several rounds in the third quarter. However, it wore off towards the fourth and they both became "meh" for a bit again.
LOL, she wants to preside over the Senate? Goodness gracious, no one wants to do that, all you get to do is listen unless there is a 50-50 tie.
I loved Biden's answer on Cheney. As I've said from the start, he is the anti-Cheney and one who will restore honor to the office.
I think Palin is coming off way too folksy now. She lost the severity that she had in the first half, which was much more appealing to me.
Biden's "I understand, I understand" speech about being a single parent worrying about his kids was very, very moving...Palin's chirpy follow-up about McCain's accomplishment was incredibly tone-deaf, it was if she hadn't listened to a word he was saying.
Indeed, throughout the night it was clear from watching CNN's ticker that the more Palin spoke about McCain, the less people liked what she was saying. It bodes pretty bad for the election when you are incapable of building up enthusiasm for your own running mate.
Joe Biden, basically: "Everyone is sent here for a reason, don't question their motive, question their actions." Well-delivered.
Palin: Rambling chirpiness about clear choices, I couldn't make heads or tails of it.
Palin's closing: Invocation of Reagan, but of course, that went over well. I'm not sure what she said mattered substantively, but it sounded good, and must have been effective for some.
Biden's closing: Started dull, invoked change which of course plays well, but delivery was underwhelming. He could have done much better and been more enthusiastic and rousing for change in his closing. A lost opportunity, I think, but it was probably Sarah's presence that kept him low-key. He didn't want to appear unstable.
==Conclusion==
How this will play in the polls I'm not sure. Palin's folksy appeal may put some life back into her ticket, but I'm skeptical. I know it doesn't move me given what I know about her off-script incompetence. (did you notice how many of her answers were just being read off notecards, especially the foreign policy?)
Biden I can't help being somewhat excited for. He's uneven as a debater, but I think he'll be great in too many ways to list as the anti-Cheney who repairs foreign relations for the better instead of destroying them as Cheney did.
Thursday, October 2
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(562)
-
▼
October
(257)
- U.S. Jury Convicts Son of Ex-Liberian President
- Hey look
- From the what-the-hell dept.
- Everyman watch
- The Economist endorses Obama, trashes McCain
- Photo of the day
- Something fishy
- Obama's primetime infomercial
- Is there any hope for this man?
- Grassroots campaigning
- Obama discusses radical redistribution of toys
- Pizza Poll: Dems like variety, Republicans like size
- Charles meets Barack
- If at first you don't succeed...
- Posted without apparent irony
- Don't just blame the media, blame the aides too
- Welcome to the post-boomer world
- Stay classy X
- The crucial space vote
- The Palin effect
- United by fear
- Pennsylvania republican apologizes for anti-Obama ...
- Top ten reasons conservatives should vote for Obama
- Vive la résistance
- That 2001 show
- The reality of human suffering
- Obama on redistribution in 2001
- Endorsement watch
- Methinks the lady doth protest too much
- Photo of the day
- Jesse Jackson, Jr.
- The Obama temptation
- The Bachmann effect
- Quotes of the day
- Israelis for Obama
- Neocon parody of the day
- Factoid of the day
- Breakin' up
- The latest lengthy "Obama-speaks-to-you-reassuring...
- The triumph of hope over fears of liberalism
- Salvaging what we can
- Come volunteer for Florida's real-ness
- From the real-er part of Virginia
- Stay classy IX
- Ten worst ads of 2008
- Real socialism
- Blame the media IV
- Stay Classy VIII
- Gen Y will get it
- Weekend update
- Ouch
- Blame the media III
- Quote of the day
- Tinklenberg leads 47-44
- ...hoosier daddy?
- Shocking editorial
- Palin haunts dreams!
- Unforced error
- Joe Klein Obama interview
- Head fake in Pennsylvania
- After denial comes anger
- Aaawwww...
- Governator on Governness action
- Nancy Pfotenhauer does her best
- What it means for some III
- Bachmann's national funding pulled
- 22 October in 100 seconds
- "Are you a Muslim?"
- More Virginia
- TPM explains the Palin effect
- Don't cry for me Argentina
- Vive la résistance
- Straw feminism
- I don't envy his inbox
- The bitter backstory behind Powell's defection
- Fighting sleazy fire with anti-sleaze fire
- The new praetorianism
- India rears its head
- Palin apologizes for "real" and pro-America remarks
- Nothing says Main Street
- Communist country
- From the over-the-top dept.
- 21 October in 100 seconds
- Why Powell matters
- Home news
- It's okay
- These people have no shame
- Donations at work
- TPM's new daily take
- A less guarded Obama
- Poll shock
- More about "real" America
- All you need to know about Fireproof
- Fascists for McCain-Palin?
- Standing athwart politics yelling checkmate
- Conquering race
- Keepin' hope alive
- In appreciation of John Stewart Mill
- Summary of the day
- Republicans against voting
-
▼
October
(257)
No comments:
Post a Comment