Saturday, October 25

The triumph of hope over fears of liberalism

Ken Adelman explains his unexpected endorsement that caused a bit of a fuss last week:
Granted, McCain's views are closer to mine than Obama's. But I've learned over this Bush era to value competence along with ideology. Otherwise, our ideology gets discredited, as it has so disastrously over the past eight years.

McCain's temperament -- leading him to bizarre behavior during the week the economic crisis broke -- and his judgment -- leading him to Wasilla -- depressed me into thinking that "our guy" would be a(nother) lousy conservative president. Been there, done that.

I'd rather a competent moderate president. Even at a risk, since Obama lacks lots of executive experience displaying competence (though his presidential campaign has been spot-on). And since his Senate voting record is not moderate, but depressingly liberal. Looming in the background, Pelosi and Reid really scare me.

Nonetheless, I concluded that McCain would not -- could not -- be a good president. Obama just might be.

That's become good enough for me -- however much of a triumph (as Dr. Johnson said about second marriages) of hope over experience.
NRO's Goldberg isn't impressed:

Ken Adelman's "Explanation" [Jonah Goldberg]

My heart bleeds that he's been forced to explain himself to friends and the like. What a burden. I just wish he'd offer something that approached an intellectually defensible explanation. Because this ain't it.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Blog Archive