a less depressing way to look at it is that we have been kicking the health care can down the road for decades. we could have addressed the problem a long time ago and the resulting tax increases wouldn't have looked so dramatic. but, as we learned with the iraq war, we have to pay the bill sometime. bush managed to kick all the costs of his wars to future generations. he, and most very president and congress before him chose to kick the costs of a decrepit and royally f'ed up health care system down to us and future generations. it doesn't make the pain any less bad but it helps put it in context.
"it's just my reforms wouldn't involve increasing taxation or entitlement eligibility."
i think the chances of that being feasible are really small.
means-testing medicare is a good idea but it won't do enough to solve the problem.
i generally like some of the things that pearlstein said but the fact remains that the only enforceable, feasible way to do anything serious about health care reform is to roll out a public plan. anything else is just leaving it to the health insurance/sickcare system we have now to do it on the honor system (and we see how well that worked out over the last few decades).
a completely free market in health had its chance for a long time. in many ways, it failed. there is far too much incentive to kill people to boost profit margins.
I'm Gherald L. and this is a place to journal and rant inexpertly about whatever interests me.
At present this includes humor, freethought, liberty, laissez-faire economics, pragmatic politics, and foreign policy of the realism school.
Random quote
“If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exchange apples then you and I will still each have one apple. But if you have an idea and I have an idea and we exchange these ideas, then each of us will have two ideas”
Content Creators, Entrepreneurship, and Tech Policy
-
As the debates around tech policy issues continue, it is important we
consider the ways such changes would impact not only “tech” businesses but
also a wid...
What’s in a hug? A lot, and nothing
-
Embed from Getty Images Governor Gretchen Whitmer, who many consider a
likely candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination, has been
trying to sq...
A Glimpse of Hell
-
Via Religion News: HOT SPRINGS, N.C. (RNS) — For years, liberals — even
liberal people of faith — have been wary of fusions of faith and politics,
careful ...
Move to the Reason site
-
(Eugene Volokh)
We’ve moved to the *Reason* site — at http://reason.com/volokh — as part of
a new joint venture with *Reason*; if you aren’t redirected au...
Adjust contrast of a pdf free
-
Closer to the eye of the shooter, this is because Preview is quite
literally applying a filter to each individual page of the PDF you are
saving. the proce...
Cellular Phone Plans for Teens
-
Look around the mall and you will notice teen after teen either talking or
texting on a cell phone. With such a large consumer base, you would think
that t...
The Years Of Writing Dangerously
-
Thirteen years ago, as I was starting to experiment with this blogging
thing, I wrote the following: [T]he speed with which an idea in your head
reaches th...
Cantor 'stunned' by Virginia Tech shootings
-
House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) said Thursday that he was
“saddened and stunned” at the news that two people, including a poli
a less depressing way to look at it is that we have been kicking the health care can down the road for decades. we could have addressed the problem a long time ago and the resulting tax increases wouldn't have looked so dramatic. but, as we learned with the iraq war, we have to pay the bill sometime. bush managed to kick all the costs of his wars to future generations. he, and most very president and congress before him chose to kick the costs of a decrepit and royally f'ed up health care system down to us and future generations. it doesn't make the pain any less bad but it helps put it in context.
ReplyDeleteOh I'm all for health care reform--it's just my reforms wouldn't involve increasing taxation or entitlement eligibility.
ReplyDeleteInstead, I'd favor reforming the existing employer-based system with one like this and means-testing Medicare.
"it's just my reforms wouldn't involve increasing taxation or entitlement eligibility."
ReplyDeletei think the chances of that being feasible are really small.
means-testing medicare is a good idea but it won't do enough to solve the problem.
i generally like some of the things that pearlstein said but the fact remains that the only enforceable, feasible way to do anything serious about health care reform is to roll out a public plan. anything else is just leaving it to the health insurance/sickcare system we have now to do it on the honor system (and we see how well that worked out over the last few decades).
a completely free market in health had its chance for a long time. in many ways, it failed. there is far too much incentive to kill people to boost profit margins.