I had a conversation at lunch yesterday with a friend, a neocon Jewish American, that fascinated me. We were getting ready to get up from the table when he said, "Hey, wait a minute, do you want to talk politics for a minute?" We proceeded to discuss the events in Iran and at one point I brought up my amazement at the protesters' embrace of non-violence and their courage in the face of aggression. I said, "I wonder if this will be a lesson to the Palestinians. That perhaps if they renounce violence and embrace peaceful resistance they too could garner more international support for their cause, a la Gandhi." His reaction fascinated me. He got this very serious, dour look on his face and replied, "That's what worries me. The biggest existential threat to Israel is that the Palestinians will realize the potential for non-violence and embrace it.
I finally understood why some of the more cynical neocons cannot stand the Green Revolution. Without a conflict, without a bogey man to demonize, they are scared to death. In their minds their legitimacy comes from the fact that they are better than the bogey man, that they are necessary to keep the bogey man at bay. I don't think that the nation of Israel is so fragile that it could not come to terms with a peaceful movement for Palestinian statehood.
Friday, June 19
Wow
A Dish reader submits some amazingly cynical neoconservatism:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(1987)
-
▼
June
(148)
- Retort of the day
- "Thanks for Sharing, Governor. Now Shut Up."
- Religious views of sex
- The worst is behind us
- And then there were sixty
- Quote for the day
- Health benefits and WWII
- Debating the public option
- Obama's speech to gay rights groups
- Ricci and judicial politics
- Neocon humor
- MSM whores
- "Terrible precedents"
- More on the latest Mankiw-Krugman spat
- "The Arbiter of Ignorance"
- "Forgive Mark Sanford"
- American and Iranian nationalism
- "Sorry sir, but this sewer is catch and release on...
- Credit where credit is due
- American Imaginer
- Krugman bashes a strawman and takes a short-term v...
- Amateur hour
- A more interesting take on Sanford
- How are those bailouts comming?
- Bloggy takedown of the day
- The pitfalls of the public option
- Leaving bad enough alone
- Some choice you're giving us, lady
- King David didn't resign after his sex scandal, so...
- Missing the logic of recognizing his own would-be-...
- Guilty pleasures
- A tragic life
- Iran's Assembly of Experts
- Against mandates
- A different perspective on Iran
- Unbreakable no longer
- The more things change...
- 40% of income on healthcare in 2100 isn't so bad, ...
- In the shadow of the mountain
- Why the obsession with Sanford?
- Dick Van Patten explains why Jesus Christ is God
- Reponding to events in Iran
- Keeping quiet
- Detainee rights
- Blame the demons
- Rawr
- Israeli settlements are illegal
- Iran election tracker
- Recount
- Line of the month
- UAW jumps the shark
- Moore Award nominee
- Redneck nerdery of the week
- The first nerd presidency of the modern era
- Roger Cohen in Iran today
- Escalating violence in Iran
- Bravo, Ron Paul
- Wow
- The importance of local legitimacy
- PETA bait
- Pictures of Israeli settlements
- The professor vs. the fighter pilot
- Lesson in democracy for neocons
- About those smoking bans
- "Administration's Reform Plan Misses the Mark"
- Stage of denial
- Prophetic quote of the day
- Worldwide protests
- A genuine rally photo
- Potemkin rallies
- Manufactured controversy watch
- "The Laffer Curve of the Left"
- Tweet of the day
- The revolution will be twittered
- The minimum wage
- That Iranian "election"
- Favored constituency watch
- Quote of the day
- Ranking the public plans
- Punblic health insurance option, ctd.
- Quote of the day
- U.S. auto industry doing well
- Quote of the day
- Tipping the scale
- Procedure over innocence
- Nanny state cometh
- Freedom and responsibility
- Paging Dr. Gore
- Obama reconsiders domestic agenda
- The next Iranian president?
- One for the (neoconish) rightists
- 29 Democrats needed
- Public health insurance, antitrust, and price cont...
- Back to work
- A stock market primer
- After gay marriage
- Joe Scarborough
- Americans care about smaller government
- How stupid do they think we are?
- Misunderstanding markets, school vouchers edition
-
▼
June
(148)
I've said something similar for a long time, although not about non-violence. If the Palestinians had merely restricted their bombings and other acts of violence to military & police targets, instead of going after innocent victims, they'd have gained legitimacy as a resistance movement instead of just being branded as terrorists. They might already have a state.
ReplyDelete"I finally understood why..."
He clearly doesn't understanding anything. His friend was simply making a point that if the Palestinians were smarter they'd pose a greater threat to Israel. He takes a perfectly reasonable point and derives a bunch of nonsense about "cynical neocons."
Maybe I'm reading too much into it in another way, but I take that remark to mean a whole series of things concerning what Palestinians might be able to do in a non-violent way.
ReplyDeleteFor example, they could demand citizenship in Israel. Rather than trying to destroy it from without, they could become part of it. If non-Jews became a majority and gained power within Israel, it wouldn't be a Jewish state any longer. I'm guessing that's the kind of "existential threat" he's talking about.