In his latest post, Paul writes, "the standard competitive market model just doesn’t work for health care: adverse selection and moral hazard are so central to the enterprise that nobody, nobody expects free-market principles to be enough.""off point", hmm. For my part, I accused Krugman of beating a strawman.
In my view, these comments are just off point. The Obama administration says it wants a public insurance plan that will compete on a level playing field with private plans (that is, without taxpayer subsidies). Is there any cogent economic analysis that suggests that such a policy addresses problems of adverse selection and moral hazard? None that I know. If it has to stand on its own financially, the public plan has no special advantage in addressing these issues.
Saturday Morning Gaming: Fallout 76 Reviewed
-
I've played it enough to reach a tentative conclusion, I think. Fallout 76
puts the cart before the horse.
The post Saturday Morning Gaming: Fallout 76 R...
2 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment