Wednesday, September 23
Indiscriminate airstrikes as political cover for withdrawal
"Nixon couldn’t leave Vietnam until he bombed Cambodia; Obama won’t leave Central Asia until he levels Afghanistan", Ordinary Will argues.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(1987)
-
▼
September
(79)
- Housing update
- Will elective abortions be crowded out?
- It's still not too late to greet us as liberators
- Libertarian purity test
- Another victory in the war on drugs
- Youtube timesaver
- Manzi on Krugman's climate change alarmism
- The U.S.-Iranian triangle
- Miscarriage of judgement
- Ich bin ein Berliner
- Quotes by William Safire (1929-2009)
- Reading Hu Jintao's mind
- Quality down
- Climate change denialism and alarmism
- New explanation for the plight of winter babies
- Bill Clinton on gay marriage
- Fear of trusts
- Worst economy since..the 1980s?
- Evangelical delusion, ctd.
- Quote of the day
- Indiscriminate airstrikes as political cover for w...
- Against the death penalty
- Did you know 4.0
- Evangelical delusion
- Presidential PowerPoint
- Bailout mania
- Proposed amendments to BaucusCare
- Sacrificing the young on the altar of safety
- Pre-emptive usage of Hillary Clinton condemned
- The cost of magic pills
- Obama favorability by region
- Quote of the day
- An open letter to Paul Krugman
- In praise of a pre-9/11 world
- Factoid of the day
- Medicare prescription drug benefit: most underrate...
- Protectionism watch
- A fitting epitaph
- Calculus in 20 minutes
- Progress
- Grad student etiquette
- Goodbye to all that, ctd.
- Excise taxes, ctd.
- Excise taxes and health care reform
- 21 most libertarian representatives
- Fake Afghan polls went for Karzai
- Movement conservatives vs. pragmatists
- Better be a DAMN good book...
- Another warm and fuzzy drug war moment
- Gibbs on the public option and competition
- Unemployment update
- Diversity: Good or Bad?
- Red State Update: Health care and town hall yell m...
- A different sort of health-care system
- Flight of the wingnut
- Mannahatta, circa 1609
- Forget everything you've been told about income mo...
- Against the Status Quo Sanctification and Extensio...
- How not to do propaganda
- Placebos are getting more effective
- Attractive women make men stupid
- Movie recommendation:The Man from Earth (2007)
- MJ medley
- Health-care legislative projections
- Congratulations are in order
- Quote of the day
- Inertia's such a bitch
- Obama's Politics of Reconciliation... Overrated?
- Practical philosophy and national health care: a r...
- Quote of the day
- Line in the sand: San Diego–Tijuana border
- Practical philosophy and national health care
- Why the recession is over, ctd.
- The new healthcare strategy
- Independents disapprove of Obama
- Does high speed rail have a future in America?
- Texas vs. Scotland
- Link blag
- Star Wars and counterinsurgency
-
▼
September
(79)
Although I think there are some good comparisons between Vietnam and Afghanistan, the use of air power isn't one of them. We aren't & won't be conducting anything like the massive sustained Cambodian bombing campaign.
ReplyDeleteTalking about "leveling" Afghanistan indicates that the writer doesn't understand how airpower is used in that theater. We aren't using strategic bombing, and we have made an effort to scale back tactical airstrikes because of all the negative effects. The drone campaign, the one element that's been expanded, is nothing like a Vietnam-style air offensive. It's basically an assassination program that uses drones as a substitute for commandos or other assassins.
And there are no targets in Afghanistan for Obama to pulverise with air power, ala Cambodia, especially since we are trying to build up the country's infrastructure.
Sure air power has changed, Predators aren't B-52s. I don't see the writer claiming otherwise.
ReplyDeleteHis point is that substituting drones for troops will result in more civilian casualties but is likely to be done as part of a withdrawal.
If in his analogy the drone campaign = bombing Cambodia, then Pakistan = Cambodia. I don't see a massive drone attack blitz in Pakistan preceding a withdrawal. I'm not sure how much we could increase drone attacks even if we wanted to, given the situation in Pakistan. Unlike Cambodia, which we could more or less bomb at will, we do have to take the Pakistani government and the risk of destabilizing the country into account.
ReplyDeleteIf we substitute drones for troops, that would mean using them inside Afghanistan, not just in the border areas & Pakistan. That would seem to be politically unfeasible, because the Afghan government doesn't like airstrikes inside its terrority. If we switch to using more airpower and creating more civilian casulties, we'll undermine the government we are trying to prop up.
The presence of different armies in Afghanistan is from my point of view necessary. At least now. But I don't know why, the situation seems to me going to be similar like it was in late 60's in Czechoslovakia. That time Soviet and soviet friendly countries entered to Czechoslovakia and stayed there more than 20 years. Hopefully it will be not like that in Afghanistan.
ReplyDeleteRegards,
Ella