The so-called Sunni Awakening, in which American forces formed tactical alliances with local sheikhs, has been credited with dampening the insurgency in much of Iraq. But new evidence suggests that the Sunnis were offering the same deal as early as 2004—one that was eagerly embraced by commanders on the ground, but rejected out of hand at the highest levels of the Bush administration.But it's ok—because by the time the administration was realistic enough to do this, the surge worked!
[..]The Sunni Awakening, when it did finally come, provided welcome relief, says Jerry Jones. But the cost of delay is quantifiable. “From July ’04 to mid-’07,” he points out, “you can directly attribute almost all those K.I.A. [killed in action] in the Sunni regions of Iraq to this fatal error, and if we hadn’t been fighting the Sunni, we’d have had a lot more resources for dealing with Shia militia leaders like Moqtada al-Sadr in places such as Baghdad. It didn’t have to happen. Those lives did not have to be lost.” To put the matter concretely: if the compromises accepted later by the Bush administration had been accepted when a rapprochement was first broached by the Sunnis, in 2004, some 2,000 Americans and thousands more Iraqis might not have died.
‘We Got Something Wrong’: California Prepares to Resist, But Differently
-
The state’s Democrats are still planning to lead the resistance to Donald
Trump, but they are also grappling with changes in their own political
landscape.
1 hour ago
Breaking news! Bush even more hideously incompetent at directing the Iraq War than previously though.
ReplyDelete"thought"
ReplyDeleteSure, but good luck finding a significant number of righties who acknowledge this and don't blame his incompetence on the media "not reporting the good news."
ReplyDelete